Skunkha
New member
@ Bonbolos
But still a lot of money is needed, protecting your work is obvious. no? but I agree the US patent is badly done this is not the way to go.
as i understand it one of the beauty of patents is its collaborative effect, consider: A researcher finds "something" economically viable. to protect his discovery he is awarded a patent for, say, 20 years for disclosing his discovery. anyone may then take this discovery and exploit it too provided a reasonable fee is paid to the patent holder.
how this works out practically: many researchers have only a piece to a puzzle of a larger challenge. another researcher somewhere finds another piece of the puzzle and with the other piece, and payment, the researchers are able to achieve their quest to a greater discovery. this is merely one way which patents have worked in the past.
But still a lot of money is needed, protecting your work is obvious. no? but I agree the US patent is badly done this is not the way to go.
as i understand it one of the beauty of patents is its collaborative effect, consider: A researcher finds "something" economically viable. to protect his discovery he is awarded a patent for, say, 20 years for disclosing his discovery. anyone may then take this discovery and exploit it too provided a reasonable fee is paid to the patent holder.
how this works out practically: many researchers have only a piece to a puzzle of a larger challenge. another researcher somewhere finds another piece of the puzzle and with the other piece, and payment, the researchers are able to achieve their quest to a greater discovery. this is merely one way which patents have worked in the past.