View Single Post
Old 01-09-2019, 01:48 PM
imsupernice imsupernice is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 98

Originally Posted by Big Sur View Post
HPS is not the bulb to compare LED to any more. CMH uses less power for the same results as MH and HPS, so ceramic Metal Halide is the one to compare LED to now. And of those, the Phillips CMH bulb is the best. LED ads also seem to be mis-informative. I have yet to test an LED system that had the output as claimed. Most are inferior Chicom produced though. I know that in Europe HPS was more popular, but here in the states, MH was more popular for growing indoors.

By the way, as an electrical engineer, I have to correct you on your statement. Watts are not a measure of current. Current is in amps, power is in watts. In simple terms, watts = amps x volts.

From your LED ad they claim that you can get an 8' x 7.8' growing area at 24" height with 615 watts. That is simply not the case. Light falls off in energy at the inverse square of the distance from the source. If you want an even 2' maximum distance with a 20" x 11" light box, you are only going to get a grow area of 5'-8" by 4'-11". Which is similar to a 630 watt CMH bulb grow area at 3 feet with similar power use. And 2 x 315 CMH bulbs are even better 2 feet above the canopy. A comparison is here:
Where i live MH was so VEG and HPS for flowering. i have a friend that is producing nice quality bud with Mars Hydro Leds.

so what is the correct word for how much electricity it really needs, power draw ?

Where do you get the 615 watt number ? says it's 3000 watt and replace 2000 watt HPS/MH.

you take the power consumption basically,what does it have to do with the real light output for the plants ?

So for example if you would like to grow an area of 100 square feet in flowering how many CMH would you need for full coverage. and how much KW would it take per hour.

Reply With Quote